<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892288</id><updated>2011-04-21T12:15:58.958-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Science and Technology Issues</title><subtitle type='html'>An area devoted to discussions surrounding science and technology stuff.  </subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00654475829950509699</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>7</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892288.post-111688551593351394</id><published>2005-05-23T14:58:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-05-23T15:02:42.256-07:00</updated><title type='text'>A Chance of Showers and a Little Shaking</title><content type='html'>&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;This was widely reported on the AP news line but they&lt;br /&gt;never referenced the actual site where the earthquake&lt;br /&gt;forecasting map resided.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;&lt;a href="http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/step/"&gt;http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/step/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;It appears to me that many of the reports on this map&lt;br /&gt;have misinterpreted its meaning.  The purpose is to&lt;br /&gt;display to the average Californian what the chances&lt;br /&gt;are that they'll have a quake in the next 24 hours. &lt;br /&gt;That's it.  There's no mention of size or location nor&lt;br /&gt;the precise location of the quake.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;One also has to look at the probabilities displayed,&lt;br /&gt;the highest probability being 1 in 10, to know that&lt;br /&gt;this remains an imprecise science.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7892288-111688551593351394?l=scitalk.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/feeds/111688551593351394/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7892288&amp;postID=111688551593351394' title='6 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/111688551593351394'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/111688551593351394'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/2005_05_01_archive.html#111688551593351394' title='A Chance of Showers and a Little Shaking'/><author><name>M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00654475829950509699</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>6</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892288.post-111587543454822731</id><published>2005-05-11T22:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-05-11T22:23:54.560-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Chimp's Art to Feature in London Auction</title><content type='html'>Ok, here's something a bit lighter.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If what this article says about Congo is true it's a truely interesting example of curiousity, playfulness, or something else entirely.  Could it be that chimps react to colors in similar fashion as humans? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/05/11/entertainment/e160840D03.DTL"&gt;Chimp's Art to Feature in London Auction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the more interesting examples of curiousity in apes, that I've seen, comes from "Last Chance to See" by Douglas Adams.  An ape takes a particular interest in Adams' shocking pink notepad while he's observing a family of apes in the wild.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0345371984/qid=1115875388/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-7099671-0412101"&gt;'Last Chance to See' by Douglas Adams and Mark Cawardine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7892288-111587543454822731?l=scitalk.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/feeds/111587543454822731/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7892288&amp;postID=111587543454822731' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/111587543454822731'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/111587543454822731'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/2005_05_01_archive.html#111587543454822731' title='Chimp&apos;s Art to Feature in London Auction'/><author><name>M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00654475829950509699</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892288.post-111570680325180135</id><published>2005-05-09T23:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-05-09T23:36:01.156-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Physical Constants Change Over Time?</title><content type='html'>&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;Sorry about the lack of blogging for the past few&lt;br /&gt;months.  I'll do better.  I promise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;For those few who actually care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;Anyways, there's an interesting article in SFGate.com.&lt;br /&gt; It states that there may be evidence that the fine&lt;br /&gt;structure constant may change over time.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;Here's the link, while it lasts:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/05/09/MNG5LCLEU41.DTL"&gt;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/05/09/MNG5LCLEU41.DTL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="mobile-post"&gt;The argument that certain physical constants may not&lt;br /&gt;be, well... constant, has been around for a little&lt;br /&gt;while.  But without any hard evidence these thoughts&lt;br /&gt;were dismissed as fanciful speculation.  Besides the&lt;br /&gt;idea that physical constants like Pi changing over&lt;br /&gt;time makes most comsologists' heads spin.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7892288-111570680325180135?l=scitalk.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/feeds/111570680325180135/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7892288&amp;postID=111570680325180135' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/111570680325180135'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/111570680325180135'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/2005_05_01_archive.html#111570680325180135' title='Physical Constants Change Over Time?'/><author><name>M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00654475829950509699</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892288.post-109582724807766268</id><published>2004-09-21T21:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-05-12T09:28:45.156-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Electron Microscope Peers into Atoms</title><content type='html'>Researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory have overcome issues with vibration and resolving power of electron microscopes to actually peer into atomic structures.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's the AP story with the oddly misleading title:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6064294/"&gt;'Tenn. Lab Develops Electron Microscope'.  By Duncan Mansfield.&lt;/a href&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The article only tempts me for more information though.  It doesn't specify whether or not this technique can be done for only certain materials or any material.  It also doesn't specify whether the material needs to be specially prepared or not, e.g. sliced, coated, doped, etc.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7892288-109582724807766268?l=scitalk.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/feeds/109582724807766268/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7892288&amp;postID=109582724807766268' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/109582724807766268'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/109582724807766268'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/2004_09_01_archive.html#109582724807766268' title='Electron Microscope Peers into Atoms'/><author><name>M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00654475829950509699</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892288.post-109471192038405083</id><published>2004-09-08T23:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-09-08T23:38:46.936-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Genesis Capsule Crashes into the Desert</title><content type='html'>Looks like another brash and unusual mission has been lost.  The Genesis capsule was to collect particles in the solar winds and have brought them back to earth via a complex parachute and helicopter combination.  Unfortunately the chute failed to deploy and the capsule tumbled helplessly into the desert floor on live TV.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20040909/ap_on_sc/genesis_capsule&amp;cid=624&amp;ncid=716&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7892288-109471192038405083?l=scitalk.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/feeds/109471192038405083/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7892288&amp;postID=109471192038405083' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/109471192038405083'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/109471192038405083'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/2004_09_01_archive.html#109471192038405083' title='Genesis Capsule Crashes into the Desert'/><author><name>M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00654475829950509699</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892288.post-109218676346905343</id><published>2004-08-10T17:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-05-12T09:27:34.276-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Printing Tissue</title><content type='html'>A group from Clemson University has developed a way to use the average ink-jet printer to create living tissue.  Without reading further details I'm supposing that the researchers print specific cells into particular patterns that would mimic the target tissue.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For years biomedical researchers have been attempting to grow tissues using methods such as growing cells in molds.  Even attempting to grow genetically modified organs in donor animals like pigs.  This is one of the simpliest and yet most logical approaches to growing tissues.  It begs the question, when they mix this technique with 3D printers how close will they get to producing whole organs?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Links:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,117318,00.asp"&gt;The Medill News Service article by Emily C Kumler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7892288-109218676346905343?l=scitalk.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/feeds/109218676346905343/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7892288&amp;postID=109218676346905343' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/109218676346905343'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/109218676346905343'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/2004_08_01_archive.html#109218676346905343' title='Printing Tissue'/><author><name>M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00654475829950509699</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7892288.post-109195016668471299</id><published>2004-08-07T23:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2004-08-08T00:33:18.973-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Gluon Glass Condensate</title><content type='html'>From &lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com"&gt;Scientific American&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0001D50C-406F-1052-BEB683414B7F0000&amp;chanID=sa008"&gt;"Shattered Glass - Seeking the densest matter: the color glass condensate" By David Appell&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In highly energetic quark-based particles it's been hypothesized that gluons form a condensate within the particle at relativistic speeds.  Produced by the over abundance of gluons created during the acceleration of the particle, the gluon condensate forms something similar to the Bose-Einstein condensate.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What interests me is the statement that acceleration creates more gluons.  With the strength of the strong force this increase in gluon creation must have a noticeable effect on acceleration of the particles.  If so, what is the manifestation of this mathematically?  I imagine it must be a deceleration, making it harder to accelerate the particle at higher speeds.  Sounds downright relativistic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;M&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7892288-109195016668471299?l=scitalk.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/feeds/109195016668471299/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7892288&amp;postID=109195016668471299' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/109195016668471299'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7892288/posts/default/109195016668471299'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://scitalk.blogspot.com/2004_08_01_archive.html#109195016668471299' title='Gluon Glass Condensate'/><author><name>M</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00654475829950509699</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
